Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW
Course: | INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
12459 | Obavezan | 1 | 8 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | |
Aims | The aim of the course is to equip students with the understanding, analysis, and application of the key principles and rules of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), its development and sources, the rights and protection of individuals in armed conflicts, international humanitarian interventions, responsibility for IHL violations, and the role and operations of international organizations and courts. |
Learning outcomes | Upon successful completion of this course, students will be able to: Understand the fundamental principles and rules of International Humanitarian Law and their application in armed conflicts; Analyze the development and sources of IHL, including the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols; Recognize the rights and obligations of combatants and the protection of civilians in armed conflicts; Evaluate the legal aspects of international humanitarian interventions and the role of international organizations in human rights protection and IHL application; Apply knowledge of IHL in analyzing current international conflicts and consider responsibility for war crimes and other IHL violations; Develop critical thinking through the analysis of judicial decisions by international courts, such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Court (ICC); Monitor and analyze the latest trends in the study and application of IHL. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | Andreja Mihailovic, PhD |
Methodology | lectures, exercises, consultations, debates |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Introduction and course overview |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | Overview of the development of International Humanitarian Law and its sources |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | Law of armed conflict |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | Rules of warfare and limitations on means and methods of warfare |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Protected persons in armed conflicts |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Prisoners of war and civilian population |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | Midterm exam |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | International humanitarian interventions |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | Cessation of hostilities |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Activities of international organizations in armed conflicts |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Protection of objects and places in armed conflicts |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | Responsibility for IHL violations |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Courts of international organizations (ICTY, ICC, and national courts); International crimes |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | Final exam |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | Supplementary teaching and makeup exam |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | |
Per week | Per semester |
8 credits x 40/30=10 hours and 40 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 5 hour(s) i 40 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 16 =170 hour(s) i 40 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 2 =21 hour(s) i 20 minuts Total workload for the subject: 8 x 30=240 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 170 hour(s) i 40 minuts (cources), 21 hour(s) i 20 minuts (preparation), 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | - Students are required to attend classes, participate in debates, and complete the midterm and final exam. - The student has passed the exam if they cumulatively collect at least 50 points on all forms of knowledge testing, and the grade is determined according to the scheme below. |
Consultations | |
Literature | Primary: Vladan Joncić, "International Humanitarian Law," Belgrade, 2010. Supplementary: R. Mujović, "International Humanitarian Law," Podgorica, 2001. S. Avramov and M. Kreća, "International Public Law," Glasnik, Belgrade, 2006. V. Dimitrijević et al., Belgrade Centre for Human Rights, Belgrade, 2005. Ž. Jazić, "UN Peace Operations," JRMP, 1995. M. Paunović, "Humanitarian Interventions in International Law," JRMP, 1999. G. Perazić, "International War Law," 1986. J. Andrassy, "General Provisions of the Geneva Conventions," 1967. UN Report on Violations of International Humanitarian Law, 2006. |
Examination methods | Forms of knowledge assessment and grading: - Colloquim – 40 points - Debate participation – 10 points - Final exam – 50 points |
Special remarks | |
Comment |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
Course: | HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
12607 | Obavezan | 1 | 8 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | There are no requirements for taking the course. |
Aims | To deal with the historical development of international law, learn how it was born and developed, during different historical eras until today. During the course, students will study the development of international law over time, considering the turning points in history that determine the periodization of the development of international law. To learn about its beginnings - the first norms and the first institutes of international law, created in the ancient period, through the middle ages, the New Century, the period between the two world wars, to modern law that developed after the Second World War. To understand contemporary international law and the factors that influenced its origin and development, through its historical predecessors. |
Learning outcomes | After the course, students will be able to deal with the genesis and evolution of international law, i.e. how it was created and developed, through different time periods; recognize and analyze important historical events in the development of international law that determine its periodization; discuss different classifications and periodization of the development of international law. Along with the emergence of international relations dating back to the creation of the first states, the first rules of international law were also developed, so at the end of this course, students will gain comprehensive knowledge of the history of international law - starting with its roots and the first norms and institutes, created in ancient times, through the Middle Ages, the New Century, the period between the two world wars, to modern law that developed after the Second World War. It is expected that students may: more successfully understand and interpret contemporary international law, the factors that influenced its development; analyze and compare positive legal institutes and doctrines with their historical predecessors; discuss the contemporary scope of international law and its perspectives in the time ahead. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | Marina Jovicevic, PhD, Assistant Professor |
Methodology | Lectures, consultations, discussions, exams. |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Introduction of the course, the teaching plan and the methods of examination. Introductory lecture: on the genesis and development of international law; periodization of the development of international law. |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | The first norms and institutes of international law. International law in the ancient world. |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | Development of international law: the Middle Ages. |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | Development of international law: the New Century. |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Development of international law: the period between the two world wars. |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Midterm exam. |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | Contemporary international law after the Second World War. International organizations. |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | Sources of contemporary international law. Development of international judiciary. |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | Make-up exam. |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Contemporary war and humanitarian law. |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Contemporary international law: United Nations. |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | Development of international protection of human rights. |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Development of regional international law. Council of Europe. Organization for European Security and Cooperation (OSCE). |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | European system of human rights protection. |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | Contemporary international law: the development of European integration and the European Union. |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | |
Per week | Per semester |
8 credits x 40/30=10 hours and 40 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 5 hour(s) i 40 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 16 =170 hour(s) i 40 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 2 =21 hour(s) i 20 minuts Total workload for the subject: 8 x 30=240 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 170 hour(s) i 40 minuts (cources), 21 hour(s) i 20 minuts (preparation), 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | Students are required to take the midterm exam and the final exam. |
Consultations | marinajo@ucg.ac.me |
Literature | Boris Krivokapić, Međunarodno pravo - koreni, razvoj, perspektive, Univerzitet Megatrend, Belgrade, 2006. |
Examination methods | Midterm exam - 50 points. Final exam - 50 points. |
Special remarks | |
Comment |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR LAW
Course: | DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR LAW/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
12608 | Obavezan | 1 | 8 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | There are no requirements for taking the course. |
Aims | |
Learning outcomes | At the end of the course, students are able to understand the foundations of diplomatic and consular law: basic concepts, sources and basic institutes of diplomatic and consular law. Students have gained an insight into the history of diplomacy and the development of diplomatic law, as well as the development of the institution of consuls and the rules governing consular relations. Student is able to: define and analyze the basic forms of diplomacy such as bilateral and multilateral diplomacy; distinguish and define permanent and special diplomatic missions; explain the differences between the diplomatic and consular services and compare their functions; explain the differences between a permanent diplomatic mission and a permanent mission of a state to an international organization. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | Marina Jovicevic, PhD, Assistant Professor; Sanja Grbović, PhD, Teaching Assistant. |
Methodology | Lectures, consultations, seminar paper, exams. |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Introduction of the course, the teaching plan and the methods of examination. Introductory lecture: subject and method of diplomatic and consular law as a teaching and scientific discipline; diplomatic law and consular law as branches of international law; sources of diplomatic and consular law. |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | History of diplomacy and development of diplomatic law. Historical development of consuls. |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | Internal bodies for the representation and maintenance of international relations: head of state, government, minister of foreign affairs. |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | External bodies representing a state at the bilateral level: permanent diplomatic missions. |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | External bodies representing a state at the bilateral level: permanent diplomatic missions. |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | External bodies representing a state at the bilateral level: special diplomatic missions. |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | External bodies representing a state at the bilateral level: special diplomatic missions. |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | Midterm exam. |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | Consulates. |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Consulates. |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Make-up exam. |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | Multilateral diplomacy: representation of states in their relations with international organizations. |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Multilateral diplomacy: status of international organizations; officials and employees of international organizations. |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | Irregular forms of establishing and maintaining diplomatic relations. |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | Final exam. |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | |
Per week | Per semester |
8 credits x 40/30=10 hours and 40 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 5 hour(s) i 40 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 16 =170 hour(s) i 40 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 2 =21 hour(s) i 20 minuts Total workload for the subject: 8 x 30=240 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 170 hour(s) i 40 minuts (cources), 21 hour(s) i 20 minuts (preparation), 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | Students are required to take the midterm and final exam. |
Consultations | marinajo@ucg.ac.me |
Literature | Miodrag Mitić, Stevan Đorđević, Diplomatsko i konzularno pravo, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2007. |
Examination methods | Seminar paper - 15 points. Midterm exam - 35 points. Final exam - 50 points. A passing grade is obtained if at least 50 points are collected. There are no requirements for taking the final exam. |
Special remarks | |
Comment |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / SEA LAW
Course: | SEA LAW/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
12609 | Obavezan | 1 | 6 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | / |
Aims | Getting to know the basic institutes of the Law of the Sea, which are of great importance for a maritime country such as Montenegro |
Learning outcomes | After the student passes this exam in the Law of the Sea course, he will be able to: define and explain the terms and problems that arise in the area of the law of the sea; state and explain the legal division of the sea, as well as the legal framework that regulates this issue; discusses the rights of coastal and non-coastal states, as well as the protection and preservation of the marine environment; compare different theoretical understandings of this field, discuss their relationship and argue the advantages and disadvantages of individual understandings; explain the jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | prof.dr Nebojša Vučinić, dr Sanja Grbović |
Methodology | Lectures and exercises with debates, essays, colloquia, seminar papers, presentations and consultations |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | The concept and significance of the Law of The Sea |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | Sources |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | Internal sea waters and archipelagic seas |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | Territorial sea, Outer sea belt, Continental shelf |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Exclusive Economic Zone, International Zone, Open Sea |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, Non-coastal states |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | Colloquium |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | Straits and sea channels, concept and conditions for scientific research of the sea |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Colloquium |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Navigation, fishing |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | Peaceful settlement of disputes in the field of international law of the sea |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Delimitation of sea belts, Prevlaka |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | Protection and preservation of the marine environment |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | Straits and sea channels |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | Classes and final exam: 8h x 16 = 128 hours Necessary preparations before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification) 8h x 2 = 16h Total hours for the course: 6 x 30 = 180 hours |
Per week | Per semester |
6 credits x 40/30=8 hours and 0 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 3 hour(s) i 0 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
8 hour(s) i 0 minuts x 16 =128 hour(s) i 0 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 8 hour(s) i 0 minuts x 2 =16 hour(s) i 0 minuts Total workload for the subject: 6 x 30=180 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 36 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 128 hour(s) i 0 minuts (cources), 16 hour(s) i 0 minuts (preparation), 36 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | / |
Consultations | After classes |
Literature | Andrassy, International Law of the Sea, Zagreb 2004. M. Kreća, Maritime law - scientific research of the sea and transfer of maritime technology, Belgrade, 2010 M. Kreća, International Public Law, 8th edition, Belgrade, 2016 Vukas, B., The Law of the Sea – Selected Writings, Leiden, Boston, 2004, p. 3-9, 83-109, 133-154, 281-289, 291-315. Encyclopedic Dictionary of the International Law of the Sea, Davorin Rudolf |
Examination methods | |
Special remarks | |
Comment |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / EUROATLANTIC INTEGRATIONS
Course: | EUROATLANTIC INTEGRATIONS/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
12610 | Obavezan | 2 | 8 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | There are no requirements for taking the course. |
Aims | To understand the process of Euro-Atlantic integration as one of the most important factors shaping relations in the international community, the evolution of that process and the influencing factors. To understand the Euro-Atlantic integration in the new world order and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as its most important framework and the main actor of contemporary international relations, as well as the circumstances and challenges it faces today. |
Learning outcomes | After the course, students are able to understand contemporary international relations and geopolitical tendencies as well as the factors that shape them, the issue of security in the global community and contemporary security challenges; students have learned about the concept of Euro-Atlantic integration and its evolution and forms of realization, as well as its importance today; students are able to analyze the importance and impact of Euro-Atlantic integration on the modern international order, as well as of other collective defense systems. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | Marina Jovicevic, PhD, Assistant Professor; Sanja Grbovic, PhD, Teaching Assistant. |
Methodology | Lectures, consultations, seminar paper, exams. |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Introduction of the course, the teaching plan and the methods of examination. Introductory lecture: the concept of Euro-Atlantic integration. |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | The evolution of Euro-Atlantic integration as the foundation of European-American relations. |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | European integration as a parallel process: from the creation of the European idea to modern times. |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): Establishment. Reasons for establishment. Goals and principles. |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Euro-Atlantic integration in the years of the Cold War. NATO doctrines. |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Euro-Atlantic integration from overcoming the Cold War to the policy of détente. |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | Midterm exam. |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | Euro-Atlantic integration in the new world order. Strategic concepts of NATO. |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | NATO expansion. |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Make-up exam. |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Euro-Atlantic integration and partnership relations. |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | EU common foreign and security policy. |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Organization for European Security and Cooperation (OSCE). |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | Montenegro in European and Euro-Atlantic integration. |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | Final exam. |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | |
Per week | Per semester |
8 credits x 40/30=10 hours and 40 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 5 hour(s) i 40 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 16 =170 hour(s) i 40 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 2 =21 hour(s) i 20 minuts Total workload for the subject: 8 x 30=240 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 170 hour(s) i 40 minuts (cources), 21 hour(s) i 20 minuts (preparation), 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | Students are required to take a midterm exam, present their seminar paper, and take a final exam. |
Consultations | marinajo@ucg.ac.me |
Literature | Mandatory: Lidija Čehulić, Euroatlantizam, Politička kultura, Zagreb, 2003. Additional: Lidija Čehulić, Euroatlantizam i suvremeni međunarodni odnosi, CID i Politička kultura, Zagreb, 2010; Budimir Košutić, Osnovi prava Evropske unije, CID, Podgorica, 2014. |
Examination methods | Midterm exam - 30 points. Presentation - 20 points. Final exam - 50 points. A passing grade is obtained if at least 50 points are collected. There are no requirements for taking the final exam. |
Special remarks | |
Comment |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / EU AND INTERNATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF HUMAN RIGHT
Course: | EU AND INTERNATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF HUMAN RIGHT/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
12611 | Obavezan | 2 | 8 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | / |
Aims | After the student passes this exam, he will be able to: o Understand and explain international legal institutes and human rights protection mechanisms, o compare the reach of legal norms and mechanisms of international supervision over respect for human rights; o interprets international legal norms and contemporary international standards; on the application of international legal norms of human rights protection to specific examples; o contributions to the development of the culture of human rights. |
Learning outcomes | After the student passes this exam, he will be able to: o Understand and explain international legal institutes and human rights protection mechanisms, o compare the reach of legal norms and mechanisms of international supervision over respect for human rights; o interprets international legal norms and contemporary international standards; on the application of international legal norms of human rights protection to specific examples; o contributions to the development of the culture of human rights. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | prof.dr Nebojša Vučinić, dr Sanja Grbović |
Methodology | Teaching methods include lectures by teachers and experts from practice, discussions, research and written projects or seminars, individual assignments and activities, including examples from practice. |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Getting to know the subject that will be the subject of study during the semester, the basic methods of the teaching and examination process. The concept of international implementation of human rights |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | International implementation of human rights - concept, history, methods and significance. |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | Limits of state sovereignty in the implementation of human rights. The supremacy of International law in relation to national law. |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | Internal implementation of human rights. Responsibility of states for assumed contractual obligations. |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Human rights protection mechanisms in international law. |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Control systems for respect for human rights. Method of reporting on compliance with international contractual obligations. |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | Colloquium |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | Regional systems of human rights protection |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | Colloquium |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Complementarity of different levels and protection systems |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Individual protection of human rights. Legal means in the protection of human rights in universal and regional systems. |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | National institutions for the protection of human rights. The role of international non-governmental organizations in the protection of human rights. |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Protection mechanisms against massive and systematic violations of human rights |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | International measures of implementation and the region of the Western Balkans |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | International implementation of human rights and Montenegro |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | Classes and final exam: (10 hours and 40 minutes) x 16 = 170 hours and 40 minutes Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 2 x (10 hours and 40 minutes) = 21 hours and 20 minutes Total workload for the course: 8 x 30 = 240 hours Supplementary work for exam preparation in the make-up exam period, including taking the make-up exam from 0 - 30 hours. Load structure: 170 hours and 40 minutes (teaching) + 21 hours and 20 minutes (preparation) + 30 hours (additional work) |
Per week | Per semester |
8 credits x 40/30=10 hours and 40 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 5 hour(s) i 40 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 16 =170 hour(s) i 40 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 2 =21 hour(s) i 20 minuts Total workload for the subject: 8 x 30=240 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 170 hour(s) i 40 minuts (cources), 21 hour(s) i 20 minuts (preparation), 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | Students are required to attend classes, participate in practical classes and take tests. Students publicly defend the seminar paper, while other students participate in the discussion after the presentation of the paper |
Consultations | After classes |
Literature | M.Nowak, UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1993. A.Eide, C.Krause, A.Rosas, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 2001. Harris, OBoyle & Warbrick, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford, 2009 L. Zwaak, Law and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Martinus Nijhoff, 1998; B. Rudden, D. Wyatt, Basic Community Laws, Oxford, 1999; M. Janis, R. Kay, A. Bradley, European Human Rights Law, Oxford 2000. |
Examination methods | Colloquiums, seminar papers, final exam |
Special remarks | / |
Comment | / |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / COMPARATIVE LEGAL SYSTEMS
Course: | COMPARATIVE LEGAL SYSTEMS/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
12612 | Obavezan | 2 | 8 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | It is not conditioned by passing an exam in another subject |
Aims | The aim of the course is to acquaint the student with the characteristics of major legal systems. In addition, the goals are: - to expand students knowledge and awareness of legal pluralism in the world, - to enable students to place their own legal system in a wider perspective, - to provide students with practical knowledge for contacts with different legal systems and cultures. |
Learning outcomes | Learning outcomes-After the student passes this exam, he will be able to: - definesand explain the development and different world legal systems; -recognizesdifferences and basic common features of the worlds legal systems and explains their conditioning; - correctevaluate and interpret the need to create a single basis for common legal regulation at the global level; - draws conclusionson the reception of rules and standards in various legal fields, especially in the field of contract law and human rights protection at the global level; - comparedifferent legal solutions for a legal issue, critically analyzes and finds the most adequate in terms of their improvement; - explaincontemporary legal reforms in Europe and the world; - understand the importance of the convergence of legal rules from different legal systems and various legal areas and explain to what extent and in what way the intensification of the process of their implementation on the international level can be influenced. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | Teachers name and surname: Assoc. Dr. Rajka Đokovic |
Methodology | Method of teaching and mastering the material:Teaching methods include lectures by teachers and experts from practice, presentations or seminars, analysis of cases from practice, comparison of legal solutions through individual tasks and student activities. |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Comparativelegal systems. Problems of classification of systems and their names. Methods of large legal system. The concept and historical origin of the European-continental legal system. The concept of the source of law in the European-continental legal system. |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | Comparison of constitutional legislation in countries belonging to the European-continental legal system. France. Germany. Switzerland. Prussia. Austria. Balkan countries. |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | Comparison of judicial legislation in countries belonging to the European family of laws. France. Germany. Switzerland. Prussia. Austria. Balkan countries. |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | Practical classes(improvement of professional knowledge and skills through practical application).Law as a source of law. Case analysis. Legal solutions and comparison. |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Customs and customs as a source of law. Practical teaching. Peculiarities of Montenegrin law and the impact of the Property Code on the rights of other countries. Comparative analysis of OIZ and other legal monuments. |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Anglo-Saxon law. The main features of thisfamilies of law. Sources of law in the Anglo-American family of law. Constitutional legislation of England and the USA. The structure of Common low. The right to fairness. Statute law and other sources of law. Hierarchy of sources of law. |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | Colloquium |
VII week exercises | Colloquium |
VIII week lectures | English law. Contract law. Concept and characteristics of contract. Offer and acceptance of the offer. Null and voidable legal affairs. Torts. Concept, origin and types of trusts. American law. Human Rights in the USA. Personal and Family Law in the USA. Legal entities and companies under US law. Inheritance in US law. Similarities and differences between English and American law. |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | Jurisprudence as a source of law.Practical teaching (improvement of professional knowledge and skills through practical application). An insight into the jurisprudence of selected cases (contract, status, family and inheritance law) of the Anglo-American family of law and their mutual comparative legal analysis, in particularwith legal solutions in European countries. |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Remedial colloquium |
X week exercises | Remedial colloquium |
XI week lectures | Legal systems of countries significantly influenced by religion: Islam, Confucianism, Shogunate, Hinduism. Sharia law. Sources and basic characteristics of Sharia law. The basic tenets of the application of Sharia law and their importance today. |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | Basic sharia law institutes. Personal rights, marriage and family law. Property law. Contracts. Torts. Waqf. Sharia law in contemporary Islamic states. |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Legalsystems of the Far East. Basic features. Chinese law. Sources. Laws. Realizing Confucianism. The application of Confucianism in Chinese law. The law of Japan. The older period of the history of Japanese law and the shogunate. Japanese law today. Sources of law. Constitution and Japanese codes. |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | Hindu law and the law of India. Religious-philosophical assumptions of Hindu law and the caste system. Indian law at the time of British colonialism and today. Jewish law. |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | Convergences between the big ones legal systems in the world. Practical teaching (improvement of professional knowledge and skills through practical application). Analysis and comparison of selected cases from various contemporary legal systems. Consideration and analysis of legal transplants from the European legal tradition (Romano-Germanic-Slavic families of law) into the legal systems of non-European countries. |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | Weekly 8 credits x 40/30 = 10 hours and 40 minutes Structure: 4 hourslectures 1 hourexercises 5 hours and 40 minutes independent student work (preparation for practical classes, colloquium, homework) including consultations. Classes and final exam (10 hours and 40 minutes) x 16 = 170 hours and 40 minutes Necessarypreparations before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 2x (10 hours and 40 minutes)=21 hours and 20 minutes Total load for the course: 8x30 hours=240 hours Supplementaryworkfor exam preparation in the make-up exam period, including taking the make-up exam 0-30 hours Load structure: 170 hours and 40 minutes (teaching) + 21 hours and 20 minutes (preparation) + 30 hours (additional work) |
Per week | Per semester |
8 credits x 40/30=10 hours and 40 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 5 hour(s) i 40 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 16 =170 hour(s) i 40 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 2 =21 hour(s) i 20 minuts Total workload for the subject: 8 x 30=240 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 170 hour(s) i 40 minuts (cources), 21 hour(s) i 20 minuts (preparation), 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | Students are required to attend theoretical classes, participate in debates, practical classes and take a colloquium. Students who prepare a seminar paper defend it publicly. After the presentation of the paper, other students participate in the debate. |
Consultations | |
Literature | 1. B. Košutic, Uvod u velike pravne sisteme danasnjice, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu , Beograd 2008. 2.A. Watson, Pravni transplanti- pristup uporednom pravu, Službeni glasnik,Beograd 2008. 3. P. Glenn, Legal traditions of the world: sustainable diversity in law, Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, cop. 2014 4.S. Sarkic-D.Popovic, Veliki pravni sistemi i kodifikacije, Savremena administracija, Beograd 1994 5.Glendon, Gordon, Osakwe, Comparative Legal Traditions, Text, Materials and Cases on the Civil and Common Law Traditions, with special reference to French, German, English and European Law , second edition, American Casebook Series, Minn, 1994. 6.K.Zweigert and H. Kotz, An introduction to Comparative Law, second edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1993. |
Examination methods | -Colloquiumand remedial colloquium – up to 30 points -Practical classes- up to 25 points (oral or written) Shapespractical classes: Case studies, seminar papers, discussions and critical reviews of the solutions of the simulated case with legal elaboration, participation in debates during the defense of other seminar papers, presentation and participation in other segments of practical classes indicated in the course content with the use of the comparative method).Practical classes is evaluated both orally and in written form. Finalexam and remedial exam - up to 45 A passing grade is obtained if at least 50 points are accumulated . |
Special remarks | |
Comment |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONALISM
Course: | EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONALISM/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
12613 | Obavezan | 2 | 6 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | / |
Aims | By studying the course, the student acquires the necessary theoretical and practical knowledge regarding constitutional arrangements, elements and contents of constitutional norms, and specificities of the constitutional systems of individual European countries. |
Learning outcomes | After student passes the exam in the subject of European constitutionalism, he will be able to: define and explain concepts and problems that arise in constitutional comparative theory; explain different concepts of organization of powers with reference to their advantages and disadvantages; understand the functioning of the most important institutions in the constitutional system and their mutual relations; and understand the peculiarities of individual constitutional systems in European countries. By getting acquainted with the constitutional systems of European countries with a rich constitutional tradition, the student will be able to more easily recognize the space for reform and strengthening of institutions in Montenegro. Based on the acquired knowledge, the student will be able to recognize, interpret, and define comparative constitutional contents, successfully discuss, and analyze important provisions of the constitution within his professional and other orientations. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | Assistant Professor Petar Šturanović, Ph.D, Teaching Assistant: Matija Stojanović, LLM |
Methodology | Teaching methods include lectures, colloquiums, exams, written seminars, discussions, individual tasks |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | The constitution and its meaning |
I week exercises | The constitution and its meaning |
II week lectures | Content of the constitution, preamble, declaration, normative part |
II week exercises | Content of the constitution, preamble, declaration, normative part |
III week lectures | Protection of the constitution |
III week exercises | Protection of the constitution |
IV week lectures | State, general characteristics |
IV week exercises | State, general characteristics |
V week lectures | Typologies of political order, organization of the state and powers |
V week exercises | Typologies of political order, organization of the state and powers |
VI week lectures | Liberal state - limited government |
VI week exercises | Liberal state - limited government |
VII week lectures | Direct and indirect power |
VII week exercises | Direct and indirect power |
VIII week lectures | Colloquium |
VIII week exercises | / |
IX week lectures | Separation of powers |
IX week exercises | Separation of powers |
X week lectures | Correction colloquium |
X week exercises | / |
XI week lectures | Federal, confederal, regional state |
XI week exercises | Federal, confederal, regional state |
XII week lectures | Forms of government - traditional typology |
XII week exercises | Forms of government - traditional typology |
XIII week lectures | Constitutional structures |
XIII week exercises | Constitutional structures |
XIV week lectures | Mutual relations of legislative and executive power |
XIV week exercises | Mutual relations of legislative and executive power |
XV week lectures | Contemporary forms of government |
XV week exercises | Contemporary forms of government |
Student workload | Weekly: 6 credits x 40/30 = 8 hours Structure: 4 hours of lectures 1 hour of exercises 3 hours of individual work including consultation. Per semester: Classes and final exam - 8h x 16 = 128 hours Necessary preparations before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification) 8h x 2 = 16 hours Total workload for the course: 6 x 30 = 180 hours |
Per week | Per semester |
6 credits x 40/30=8 hours and 0 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 3 hour(s) i 0 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
8 hour(s) i 0 minuts x 16 =128 hour(s) i 0 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 8 hour(s) i 0 minuts x 2 =16 hour(s) i 0 minuts Total workload for the subject: 6 x 30=180 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 36 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 128 hour(s) i 0 minuts (cources), 16 hour(s) i 0 minuts (preparation), 36 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | Students are required to attend classes, participate in debates, take tests, and write seminars. |
Consultations | After class and always at the request of the students. |
Literature | Giuseppe de Vergotini, Comparative Constitutional Law, Official Gazette, Belgrade, 2015 |
Examination methods | Colloquium - 40 points, Exam - 50 points, Seminar - 10 points. The student has passed if he/she accumulates at least 50 points in all forms knowledge testing. |
Special remarks | / |
Comment | / |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / LEGAL METHODOLOGY
Course: | LEGAL METHODOLOGY/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
13149 | Obavezan | 3 | 7 | 4+0+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | - |
Aims | The course goal is to introduce students to the basic philosophical and scientific methods of understanding law. |
Learning outcomes | Students who pass this course will be able to: articulate the concept and subject matter of legal methodology, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of this foundational aspect of legal studies. They will possess the ability to describe the most significant cognitive and technical methods utilized within the legal field, differentiate between philosophical and scientific methods of law comprehension, which is crucial for understanding the varied approaches to legal theory and practice |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | Full professor Marko Dokić, PhD |
Methodology | lectures, exercises, consultations |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Concept of legal methodology |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | Concept and types of legal knowledge methods |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | Philosophical methods of legal knowledge |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | Scientific methods of legal knowledge: independent scientific methods of legal knowledge |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Real methods, psychological methods and law |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Sociological method and law |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | Dogmatic method (Method of law interpretation) |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | Normative method |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | Historical-legal method and comparative legal method |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Colloquium |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Colloquium - second term |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | Technical methods of creating law |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Creation of law by general norms in the form of individual |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | Direct creation of law by general norms |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | Methods of applying law |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | |
Per week | Per semester |
7 credits x 40/30=9 hours and 20 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 0 excercises 5 hour(s) i 20 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
9 hour(s) i 20 minuts x 16 =149 hour(s) i 20 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 9 hour(s) i 20 minuts x 2 =18 hour(s) i 40 minuts Total workload for the subject: 7 x 30=210 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 42 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 149 hour(s) i 20 minuts (cources), 18 hour(s) i 40 minuts (preparation), 42 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | |
Consultations | |
Literature | Radomir Lukić, Metodologija prava, Beograd, SANU, 1977. |
Examination methods | - Colloquim – up to 50 points - Final exam – up to 50 points |
Special remarks | |
Comment |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / INTERNATIONAL LEGAL CLINICS
Course: | INTERNATIONAL LEGAL CLINICS/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
13150 | Obavezan | 3 | 8 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | / |
Aims | Acquaintance of students with the application of the institute of international public law, especially in the field of refugee law, protection of human rights of vulnerable groups and obligations of states. |
Learning outcomes | After the student passes this exam, he will be able to: properly interpret the practice in the field of international legal protection of human rights, with a special emphasis on the rights of refugees, asylum seekers, immigrants and stateless persons; apply relevant international and domestic regulations and standards created in the practice of international bodies, with a special emphasis on UNHCR; provides legal advice in the field of refugee, immigrant, asylum seeker and stateless law; contributes to activities in the fight against statelessness; spreads knowledge about relevant international legal rules, both at the level of the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the European Union, and at the level of Montenegrin law. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | prof. dr Nebojša Vučinić, dr Sanja Grbović |
Methodology | Teaching methods include lectures by teachers and experts from practice, discussions, research and written projects or seminars, visits to relevant institutions and individual tasks and activities. |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Get familiar with the material that will be the subject of study during the semester, the basic methods of the teaching and examination process. Introductory theoretical overview of basic legal institutes of international protection of human rights in peace and armed conflicts |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | General characteristics (principles) of international humanitarian law and human rights law, rights of refugees, asylum seekers, immigrants and stateless persons, analysis of relevant legal acts. |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | Getting to know the case, which is the subject of the clinic; theoretical processing and division of tasks; development of general concepts of the subject case; content analysis, practical teaching |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | Elaboration of key legal institutes and application of international standards in connection with the case in question. |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Analysis of key provisions from the UN Convention on the Status of Refugees, the accompanying Protocol, the Declaration on Territorial Asylum. Practical teaching: Debate and legal argumentation pro et contra. |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Law on Asylum of Montenegro, Law on Citizenship of Montenegro. Practical teaching: Elaboration of individual topics of the given case, by role Research and analysis of relevant legislation. |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | colloquium |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | Theoretical review of international procedural law - judicial settlement of disputes, with emphasis on the International Court of Justice; practical elaboration of the given case. Practical teaching: a case study from international judicial practice |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | Consideration of research results of relevant international legislation; Practical teaching: preparation and presentation of legal argumentation through comparative legal analysis of court and arbitration practice, as well as the application of all relevant sources to the case. |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Practical classes |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Practical classes |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | Practical classes |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Practical classes |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | Practical classes |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | Practical classes |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | Classes and final exam: (8 hours) x 16 = 128 hours Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 2 x (8 hours) = 16 hours Total load for the course: 6 x 30 = 180 hours Supplementary work for exam preparation in the make-up exam period, including taking the make-up exam from 0 - 30 hours. Load structure: 128 hours (teaching) + 16 hours (preparation) + 30 hours (additional work) |
Per week | Per semester |
8 credits x 40/30=10 hours and 40 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 5 hour(s) i 40 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 16 =170 hour(s) i 40 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 2 =21 hour(s) i 20 minuts Total workload for the subject: 8 x 30=240 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 170 hour(s) i 40 minuts (cources), 21 hour(s) i 20 minuts (preparation), 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | Students are required to attend classes, do homework, analyze cases from court practice that the teacher gives them to solve |
Consultations | After classes |
Literature | Relevant legal acts of international and domestic law, Practice in international public law, S. Djajić, Novi Sad, 2012; Practice in human rights, M. Kreća, M. Paunović, 2002. Public International Law-cases and materials, West Law, 2014. Additional reading: I. Brownlie: Basic Principles of Public International Law, Oxford, 2010, I. Jelić: State responsibility in international law, UCG, Podgorica, 2009. |
Examination methods | colloquia, seminar papers, final exam |
Special remarks | / |
Comment | / |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Course: | INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
13151 | Obavezan | 3 | 8 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | / |
Aims | Introducing students to basic concepts and the importance of environmental protection. |
Learning outcomes | After the student passes this exam, he will be able to: recognize, differentiate and explain the relationships regulated by the International Environmental Protection Law ; analyzes the basic international sources of law; distinguish between international courts and other bodies before which these rights are protected; recognize and use procedures available in national law. |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | Prof.dr Maja Kostić-Mandić, dr Sanja Grbović |
Methodology | Lectures, practical forms of teaching (case studies, student presentations, discussions, simulations, writing legal opinions), exercises, consultations. |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Introductory notes on the subject and literature, ecology and the environment, the importance of studying international environmental protection |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | Global environmental problems (climate change, ozone depletion, loss of biodiversity, water and land pollution, forest degradation, waste management, GMOs, major incidents, chemical risk and radiation hazard) |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | International treaties as sources of law |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | Practice of the International Court of Justice (case studies) |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Human rights and environmental protection; practice of the European Court of Human Rights (case studies) |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Basic principles on which environmental protection is based (principle of prevention, principle of polluter pays, principle of coordination and cooperation) (case studies) |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | Colloquium |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | European Environmental Protection Law |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | Colloquium |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Availability and access to information, the possibility of public participation in environmental decision-making and legal protection of these rights |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Environmental impact assessment and Strategic environmental impact assessment |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | Transboundary pollution |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Remedies available before the national courts (case studies) |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | Trial simulation (hypothetical case of building a facility on a lake located in three countries) |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | Writing a legal opinion on a given topic |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | Classes and final exam: 85 hours Necessary preparations (administration, registration, certification before the beginning of the semester): 10 hours Total workload for the course: 120 hours Additional work: 25 hours Load structure: 85 hours (teaching) + 10 (preparation) + 25 (additional work) |
Per week | Per semester |
8 credits x 40/30=10 hours and 40 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 5 hour(s) i 40 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 16 =170 hour(s) i 40 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 10 hour(s) i 40 minuts x 2 =21 hour(s) i 20 minuts Total workload for the subject: 8 x 30=240 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 170 hour(s) i 40 minuts (cources), 21 hour(s) i 20 minuts (preparation), 48 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | Attendance and active participation in practical classes |
Consultations | |
Literature | M. Kostić-Mandić, International Environmental Law, Hrestomatija, Faculty of Law, Podgorica, 2024. General literature (available in the Faculty of Law Library) |
Examination methods | Forms of knowledge assessment are colloquium, final exam and remedial exam (in oral form) and exam in August. The following are evaluated: - Colloquium - up to 30 points - Participation in practical classes - up to 40 points - Final exam - up to 30 points - A passing grade is obtained if at least 50 points are accumulated cumulatively |
Special remarks | / |
Comment | / |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |
Faculty of Law / INTERNATIONAL LAW / INTERNATIONAL REALATIONS
Course: | INTERNATIONAL REALATIONS/ |
Course ID | Course status | Semester | ECTS credits | Lessons (Lessons+Exercises+Laboratory) |
13152 | Obavezan | 3 | 7 | 4+1+0 |
Programs | INTERNATIONAL LAW |
Prerequisites | / |
Aims | Understanding the processes and tendencies of international relations, their basic carriers and possible directions of further development. |
Learning outcomes | After successfully passing the course, the student will be able to: - recognizes the most important subjects of international relations - interprets the basic factors of international relations - connects the relations between theory and history of international relations - explains the most important trends in the dynamics of contemporary international relations |
Lecturer / Teaching assistant | Prof.dr Boris Vukićević |
Methodology | Lectures and exercises with debates, essays, tests, seminar papers, presentations and consultations |
Plan and program of work | |
Preparing week | Preparation and registration of the semester |
I week lectures | Introduction |
I week exercises | |
II week lectures | Subject and method. International relations as a scientific discipline |
II week exercises | |
III week lectures | Historical development of the system of international relations, I |
III week exercises | |
IV week lectures | Historical development of the system of international relations, II |
IV week exercises | |
V week lectures | Theoretical frameworks of modern observation of international relations |
V week exercises | |
VI week lectures | Factors of international political relations |
VI week exercises | |
VII week lectures | Colloquium |
VII week exercises | |
VIII week lectures | Subjects of international relations |
VIII week exercises | |
IX week lectures | International community. Activities of states in international relations |
IX week exercises | |
X week lectures | Ways and means of communication in international relations |
X week exercises | |
XI week lectures | Colloquium II |
XI week exercises | |
XII week lectures | Colloquium I and II |
XII week exercises | |
XIII week lectures | Types of international relations, I |
XIII week exercises | |
XIV week lectures | Types of international relations, II |
XIV week exercises | |
XV week lectures | New world order |
XV week exercises |
Student workload | Classes and final exam: (5 hours) x 16 = 90 hours Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 2 x (8 hours) = 16 hours Total workload for the course: 7 x 30 = 210 hours Supplementary work for exam preparation in the make-up exam period, including taking the make-up exam from 0 - 30 hours. Load structure: 128 hours (teaching) + 16 hours (preparation) + 30 hours (additional work) |
Per week | Per semester |
7 credits x 40/30=9 hours and 20 minuts
4 sat(a) theoretical classes 0 sat(a) practical classes 1 excercises 4 hour(s) i 20 minuts of independent work, including consultations |
Classes and final exam:
9 hour(s) i 20 minuts x 16 =149 hour(s) i 20 minuts Necessary preparation before the beginning of the semester (administration, registration, certification): 9 hour(s) i 20 minuts x 2 =18 hour(s) i 40 minuts Total workload for the subject: 7 x 30=210 hour(s) Additional work for exam preparation in the preparing exam period, including taking the remedial exam from 0 to 30 hours (remaining time from the first two items to the total load for the item) 42 hour(s) i 0 minuts Workload structure: 149 hour(s) i 20 minuts (cources), 18 hour(s) i 40 minuts (preparation), 42 hour(s) i 0 minuts (additional work) |
Student obligations | |
Consultations | |
Literature | Radovan Vukadinović, International Political Relations, Zagreb, 2004. Radovan Vukadinović, Theories of International Relations, Zagreb, 2005. Additional reading: Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, Joseph Nye, How to Understand International Conflicts, Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations, Imanuel Wallersteen, The Modern World System, John Geddis, The Cold War, Radovan Vukadinović, US Foreign Policy in the Cold War Era, Radovan Vukadinović, America and Russia, Remon Aron, Peace and War Among Nations, Paul Johnson, Modern Times, Georges-Henri Sutu, Europe from 1815 to the Present Day, Hans Morgenthau, Theory of International Politics, Charles V., Kegley, Eugene R ., Vitkof, World politics: trend and transformation, Belgrade, 2006, Radovan Vukadinović, International relations from the Cold War to the global order, Zagreb, 2000. |
Examination methods | Two written tests 25+25 points (for the 1st test – material covered up to the 1st test according to the catalog; 2nd test – material covered between the first and second test, according to the catalog) Oral final exam 50 points (complete material) For grades A and B, it is necessary to answer additional literature on the exam |
Special remarks | / |
Comment | / |
Grade: | F | E | D | C | B | A |
Number of points | less than 50 points | greater than or equal to 50 points and less than 60 points | greater than or equal to 60 points and less than 70 points | greater than or equal to 70 points and less than 80 points | greater than or equal to 80 points and less than 90 points | greater than or equal to 90 points |